THE MODEL
The Model as an architecture for business psychology

BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS

Behavioral economics and self-deception: Why people defend bad deals

People do not calculate neutrally. They protect earlier decisions, overvalue visible signals and avoid the pain of recognizing a loss. A bad deal is therefore often defended longer than the original decision took.

Sunk costs become emotional property

The more time, money or hope has been invested, the harder it becomes to leave. Economically, past costs cannot be recovered. Psychologically, they become an argument for investing even more.

The Model changes the question from how much has already been invested to what action makes sense with today's information.

Expectations change perception

Investors, leaders and partners search for evidence that protects the outcome they want. Contradictions are explained away or postponed.

The Model treats expectation as a separate variable and tests observations against alternative explanations.

No can be economically productive

A boundary does not only end opportunities. It protects resources and influences the terms of future interactions.

The immediate loss of saying no may be smaller than the long-term cost of accepting a bad system.

Core principles

  1. Past costs must not automatically dictate future investment.
  2. Expectations are hypotheses, not evidence.
  3. Boundaries have economic value.
  4. A loss can be the least expensive available decision.

Questions and answers

Which behavioral economics themes appear in the book?

Loss aversion, sunk costs, expectation effects, status, exchange, trust, priorities and self-deception.

Is the analysis limited to companies?

No. The same mechanisms operate in investing, relationships, careers, consumption and personal responsibility.